← Back to Home

Compare State ESA Programs

Side-by-side analysis of Education Savings Account programs across all states

National ESA Landscape: Key Insights

Total States

19

with active or enacted ESA programs.

Total Enrollment

1,219,635

students participating nationwide.

Total Funding

$13.28B

in combined annual program funding.

Program Types

Universal13
Special Education4
Income-Limited1
Geographic1
Targeted (Income, District)1

How Do State ESA Programs Compare?

StateProgram Name(s)StatusEligibilityEnrollment (Latest)Program BudgetAvg. AwardSwitcher Rate (Latest)Year Launched
Florida
Family Empowerment Scholarship Programs (FES-EO, FES-UA)
Family Empowerment Scholarship Programs (FES-EO, FES-UA) (FES-EO, FES-UA, FTC, PEP)
Active
Universal
$4500.0M
FY2024-25
$8,00031%2019
Arizona
Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA)
Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA)
Active
Universal92,362$1037.0M
FY2026 (Projected)
$10,34957%2011
Iowa
Students First Education Savings Account Program
Students First Education Savings Account Program (Students First Act)
Active
Universal
$218.0M
FY2024-25 (Year 2)
$7,82670%2023
Tennessee
Education Freedom Scholarship Act (+ IEA Program, ESA Pilot Program)
Education Freedom Scholarship Act (+ IEA Program, ESA Pilot Program) (EFS, IEA)
Active
Universal
$1100.0M
FY2026-FY2030 (5-Year Projection)
$8,50035%2025
West Virginia
Hope Scholarship Program
Hope Scholarship Program (Hope Scholarship)
Active
Universal19,000$315.0M
FY2027+ (Post-Universal Projection)
$4,921100%2022
Alabama
Creating Hope and Opportunity for Our Students' Education (CHOOSE) Act
Creating Hope and Opportunity for Our Students' Education (CHOOSE) Act (CHOOSE Act)
Active
Universal (Phased)
$150.0M
FY2028 (Year 3 Baseline)
N/A16%2025
Arkansas
Arkansas Children's Educational Freedom Account Program
Arkansas Children's Educational Freedom Account Program (Education Freedom Accounts (EFA))
Active
Universal (Phased)14,256$277.0M
FY2025-26 (Year 3 - Universal)
$6,85612%2023
New Hampshire
Education Freedom Accounts (EFA)
Education Freedom Accounts (EFA) (EFA)
Active
Universal
$52.0M
FY2026 (2025-26 Post-Universal)
$5,20445%2021
South Carolina
Education Scholarship Trust Fund (ESTF)
Education Scholarship Trust Fund (ESTF) (ESTF)
Active
Income-Limited
$75.0M
SY2025-26 (Year 2, SB 62 Restructured)
$7,500N/A2024
Georgia
Georgia Promise Scholarship
Georgia Promise Scholarship (Promise Scholarship)
Active
Geographic
$141.0M
SY2025-26 (Inaugural Year)
$6,500N/A2025
North Carolina
Personal Education Student Accounts for Children with Disabilities (ESA+)
Personal Education Student Accounts for Children with Disabilities (ESA+) (ESA+)
Active
Special Education
$58.0M
FY2032-33 (With Annual Escalator)
$11,846100%2017
Mississippi
Equal Opportunity for Students with Special Needs Program
Equal Opportunity for Students with Special Needs Program (Special Needs ESA)
Active
Special Education345$5.0M
FY2026 (Waitlist Response)
$7,829100%2015
Montana
Special Needs Equal Opportunity Education Savings Account Program
Special Needs Equal Opportunity Education Savings Account Program (Special Needs ESA)
Active
Special Education
$0.3M
FY2024-25 (Based on 46 students)
N/A100%2024
Oklahoma
Parental Choice Tax Credit Act
Parental Choice Tax Credit Act
Active
Universal (Tax Credit)N/A$200.0M
FY2025
$6,500N/A2024
Louisiana
Louisiana Giving All True Opportunity to Rise (LA GATOR) Scholarship
Louisiana Giving All True Opportunity to Rise (LA GATOR) Scholarship (LA GATOR)
Active (Underfunded)
Universal (Phased)
$520.0M
Long-Term Fully-Funded Universal (PAR Estimate)
$9,53325%2025
Indiana
Education Scholarship Account Program (INESA)
Education Scholarship Account Program (INESA) (INESA)
Active (At Capacity)
Special Education
$11.5M
FY2024-25
$11,60175%2022
Texas
Texas Education Freedom Accounts (TEFA)
Texas Education Freedom Accounts (TEFA) (TEFA)
Enacted (Not Launched)
Universal
$4600.0M
FY2030 (LBB Projection)
$10,8005%2026
Wyoming
Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Program
Steamboat Legacy Scholarship Program (Wyoming ESA)
Halted (Injunction)
Universal
$30.0M
FY2025-26 (One-time appropriation, UNSPENT)
$7,000N/A2025
Ohio
Afterschool Child Enrichment (ACE) Program
Afterschool Child Enrichment (ACE) Program
Inactive
Targeted (Income, District)N/AN/A
$1,000N/A2021
Utah
Utah Fits All Scholarship Program
Utah Fits All Scholarship Program (UFA)
Active (Contested)
Universal (Phased)
$122.0M
FY2025-26 (Year 2)
$8,000N/A2024

Key Comparison Insights

Largest Programs by Enrollment

  1. 1
    Florida
    students
  2. 2
    Arizona
    92,362 students
  3. 3
    Iowa
    students
  4. 4
    Tennessee
    students
  5. 5
    West Virginia
    19,000 students

Highest Average Awards

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Indiana
    $11,601
  3. 3
    Texas
    $10,800
  4. 4
    Arizona
    $10,349
  5. 5
    Louisiana
    $9,533

Program Types Distribution

Universal Programs13
Special Education4
Other Targeted3

What are the Switcher Rates Across States?

Switcher Rate Definition: The percentage of new ESA participants who previously attended public schools. This metric is critical for fiscal analysis - high switcher rates suggest program functions as "exit ramp" from public schools, while low rates indicate subsidy for existing private school families.

FY2022-23 - Step Up For Students data shows only 31% of new scholarship recipients came from public schools. The inverse, a 69% 'non-switcher' rate, means the program primarily subsidizes existing private school families. This is a critical distinction from programs like Arizona's, which has a high switcher rate.
FY2025 Q4 - Official AZ Dept of Education Q4 FY25 Report: Percentage of new universal-eligibility students (grades 1-12) who came directly from Arizona public schools. This is the nation's highest reported switcher rate for a universal program.
Iowa70%
FY2023-24 (EdChoice Alternative - Broad Definition) - A re-analysis from EdChoice that argues the official rate is incomplete. This model re-categorizes most kindergarteners and a large portion of existing private school students (who previously used other state aid like STO scholarships) as 'switchers' based on an 'ecosystem' view.
FY2025-26 (EFS Universal Program) - CRITICAL DATA GAP: TN Fiscal Review Committee ASSUMES 35% switcher rate (65% non-switchers) in official fiscal projections. However, TDOE is NOT collecting or tracking actual prior enrollment data for EFS participants. No switcher mandate for EFS. Entire fiscal model based on unverifiable assumption.
Program Design (2022-2025) - A 'switcher mandate' was in effect from 2022-2025, theoretically creating a 100% switcher rate. However, this was contradicted by the 'kindergarten paradox' (see Key Findings).
FY2025-26 (First Year) - Official ALDOR data: Only 16% of activated ESA students came from Alabama public schools in prior year. This means 84% were non-switchers (already in private school/homeschool), representing new state expenditure rather than cost transfer.
FY2024-25 (Year 2 - Official) - Official AR Dept of Education / EDRE Annual Report: Percentage of all EFA participants (1,710 of 14,256) who attended an Arkansas public school in the immediately preceding year. Confirms a very low initial switcher rate.
FY2025 (Alternative Model) - An alternative analysis from EdChoice that adjusts for kindergarteners and students in public school in prior years to estimate a higher switcher rate.
Program Design - All participants are 'switchers' by design. The program's unique and restrictive rules require a formal 'Eligibility Determination' document from a NC public school system (LEA), meaning all participants must be formally identified within the public system to qualify.
Program Design - The parent agreement requires formally withdrawing the child from the public school system, meaning all participants are 'switchers' by definition.
Program Design - A 'switcher' mandate is built into the program's eligibility, requiring that a student was either in public school the prior year, is new to the state, or is a rising kindergartener.
FY2025-26 (Applicant Pool Estimate) - Of ~40,000 applicants, only ~10,000 were switchers from public schools; remaining 30,000 already in private schools/homeschool
FY2023-24 - Approximately 75% of participants had attended Indiana public school at some point in their educational careers
FY2027 (LBB Year 1 Projection) - The LBB projects only 24,500 of 479,500 total participants (5.1%) will be direct public school switchers in Year 1. NOTE: The LBB's fiscal model relies on a separate, crucial assumption that 70% of *new private school capacity* will be filled by public school switchers. The overall program switcher rate is low due to the massive projected influx of existing private and homeschool students.

Accountability & Oversight Features

StateTesting MandatesFinancial AuditingAdministering AgencyFinancial Platform
FloridaYes, schools must annually administer a state-approved, nationally norm-referenced test to all scholarship students. However, there are no consequences tied to the results; the mandate is to test, not to demonstrate proficiency or growth.SFOs must undergo an annual financial and compliance audit by an independent CPA. Participating private schools are also subject to periodic audits to ensure compliance.Florida Department of Education / Scholarship Funding Organizations (SFOs)Varies by SFO - Step Up For Students and AAA Scholarship Foundation each use proprietary systems
ArizonaNo state testing requirement for ESA participants (contrast with public schools)Arizona Dept of Education risk-based auditing; ClassWallet transaction monitoring; Significant oversight deficit documented due to rapid program growth (12 auditors for 90,000+ accounts)Arizona Department of EducationClassWallet
IowaNot specified in enabling legislation for ESA participants. Participating schools must be accredited.Iowa Department of Education oversight; Odyssey platform transaction monitoring; All participating schools must be state-accredited. Subject to audits by Iowa State Auditor's Office.Iowa Department of EducationOdyssey
TennesseeIEA: State TCAP test or nationally norm-referenced test required (results not publicly reported). Pilot: MANDATORY TCAP testing for grades 3-11 (results publicly reported and compared to public schools). EFS: Testing requirements TBD.Tennessee Dept of Education oversight; Pilot program has most stringent accountability with mandatory public TCAP reportingTennessee Department of EducationPrepaid debit card system (IEA); Online payment portal (Pilot/EFS)
West VirginiaNot specified for private school participants. Homeschool participants must submit annual assessment results or a portfolio review.Oversight by the WV Hope Scholarship Board and State Treasurer's Office. The TheoPay platform provides a digital audit trail for all transactions.West Virginia Hope Scholarship Board (chaired by State Treasurer)Student First Technologies (Theodore/TheoPay platform)
AlabamaNot specified in enabling legislationAlabama Department of Revenue oversight; ClassWallet transaction monitoring and audit trail; No direct reimbursements allowed (all payments through platform)Alabama Department of Revenue (ALDOR)ClassWallet
ArkansasYes, annual nationally norm-referenced test required in reading and math.Arkansas Department of Education is mandated to conduct random audits of accounts, schools, and providers. Anonymous fraud reporting hotline established.Arkansas Department of Education (Office of School Choice and Parent Empowerment)ClassWallet (switched from Student First Tech after Year 1 performance issues)
New HampshireNot specified in program rules for EFA participants.Oversight is delegated to the private nonprofit administrator (CSFNH). State legislative auditors reported being unable to access primary program data from the contractor, creating a major accountability and transparency issue.New Hampshire Department of Education / Children's Scholarship Fund NH (CSFNH)ClassWallet (administered by Children's Scholarship Fund NH, a private nonprofit under a sole-source contract)
South CarolinaNot specified in current legislationSC Dept of Education oversight; Private Trustee fiduciary responsibility; ClassWallet transaction monitoring; All payments must be through platform (no direct reimbursements to parents)South Carolina Department of Education / Private TrusteeClassWallet
GeorgiaALL participating students MUST take annually: Nationally norm-referenced test OR Georgia statewide assessment measuring math and language arts progress. Pre-approved tests: ACT, SAT, Iowa Assessments, NWEA MAP, TerraNova, others.Multi-layer accountability: (1) GESA conducts random audits of individual accounts annually, (2) GA Dept of Audits and Accounts performs comprehensive program audit annually, (3) Schools must show financial stability (1+ year operation OR CPA audit), (4) Cases of fraud referred to GA Attorney GeneralGeorgia Education Savings Authority (GESA) / Georgia Student Finance Commission (GSFC)Odyssey
North CarolinaParticipating students required to take nationally norm-referenced achievement test annually; Results reported to state in aggregate/anonymized form; No minimum score required to maintain scholarshipPROACTIVE model: ClassWallet pre-approval system for all expenses before funds disbursed (prevents misuse); NCSEAA staff review; Creates real-time digital audit trail; Private schools receiving $300K+ require CPA financial reviewNorth Carolina State Education Assistance Authority (NCSEAA)ClassWallet (partnership with NCSEAA since 2018)
MississippiNot specified in program rules for ESA participants.Mississippi Dept. of Education oversight; The state's PEER Committee (Joint Legislative Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review) conducts detailed program audits that have driven legislative refinements.Mississippi Department of Education (Office of Special Education)State-managed reimbursement system (no third-party platform). This creates a significant socioeconomic filter, as families must pay costs upfront.
MontanaNot specified in program rules for ESA participants.Montana Office of Public Instruction (OPI) oversight and reimbursement review. 5% of all funds are retained by OPI for program administration.Montana Office of Public Instruction (OPI)State-managed reimbursement system (no third-party platform). This creates a significant socioeconomic filter, as families must pay costs upfront.
OklahomaNoOklahoma Tax CommissionOklahoma Tax CommissionN/A (Administered via Tax Filing)
LouisianaYes, all participating students are required to take either the state LEAP assessment or a state board-approved nationally norm-referenced test annually.The LDOE is authorized to conduct audits and investigate fraud, with the ability to refer cases to the Attorney General. Proactive guardrails are implemented via the Odyssey platform (e.g., price caps on technology).Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) / Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE)Odyssey
IndianaStudents must take state's standardized assessment OR alternative assessment as specified in their special education service planOffice of Indiana Treasurer of State oversight; ClassWallet transaction monitoring; All service providers must be approved; Schools require accreditation verification; State financial auditsOffice of the Indiana Treasurer of StateClassWallet
TexasTo be determined; Statute does not specify testing requirements for TEFA participantsTexas Comptroller of Public Accounts oversight; Odyssey platform transaction monitoring; Comptroller's office prioritizes fiscal control and fraud prevention over educational oversightTexas Comptroller of Public AccountsOdyssey (selected as Certified Educational Assistance Organization/CEAO for financial management)
WyomingStatute requires statewide assessment OR nationally norm-referenced achievement test annually (but program never launched to implement)WY Dept of Education authorized to conduct random audits of at least 2% of accounts annually; Up to 5% of appropriation for administration (but program never launched)Wyoming Department of EducationOdyssey (selected and contracted, but platform never went operational due to injunction)
OhioNoStandard state and federal auditing of relief funds.Ohio Department of Education and WorkforceMerit
UtahNot specified in program rules.Utah State Board of Education oversight. The program experienced a major administrative crisis in Year 1, with its initial program manager (ACE Scholarships) being replaced mid-year due to severe audit backlogs, reimbursement delays, and public spending scandals.Utah State Board of Education / Third-Party Program ManagerOdyssey (took over mid-2025)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which state has the largest ESA program?

Florida has the largest and most complex school choice ecosystem in the nation, serving over 500,000 students across its multiple scholarship programs, including the Family Empowerment Scholarship (FES) programs.

How many states have universal ESA programs?

As of the latest data, at least 12 states have enacted universal or near-universal ESA programs that are either active or launching soon. This represents a major trend in school choice policy, moving away from targeted, means-tested programs toward broad eligibility for all students.

What is a 'switcher rate' and why is it important?

The 'switcher rate' is the percentage of ESA participants who were previously enrolled in a public school. It's the most critical metric for fiscal analysis. A high switcher rate suggests the program is providing an exit from public schools and may generate net savings for the state. A low switcher rate indicates the program is primarily subsidizing existing private school or homeschool students, representing a new cost to the state.

About Our Data

E-E-A-T Commitment: We are committed to providing a trustworthy and authoritative resource on Education Savings Accounts. Our data is meticulously compiled and cross-referenced from primary sources to ensure the highest level of accuracy.

All data on this page is sourced from official state agency reports (e.g., Departments of Education, State Treasurers' Offices), legislative documents (e.g., enabling statutes, fiscal notes from legislative budget offices), and comprehensive analyses from non-partisan research organizations and reputable think tanks. Each state's individual page contains a detailed list of its specific primary sources.